Canada Looks to Europe as the Global Order Shifts, and the Gulf between War, Business and Uncertainty

There is something deeply contradictory about inviting the world to invest in a country while its capital is repeatedly preparing to close itself behind containers. Islamabad should be Pakistan’s most predictable city. It hosts embassies, diplomats, international organizations, investors, foreign delegations and the highest offices of the state. Yet whenever political tension rises, the same images return. Containers appear on roads, entry points are restricted, meetings are cancelled and ordinary people begin calculating how they will reach offices, hospitals, airports or universities. After a few days, things may return to normal, but the larger question remains: what message are we sending to the world?

I ask this not only as an observer, but as someone working on international business engagement between Canada, Pakistan and the Gulf. Through initiatives such as the Canada Gulf Gateway, the objective is to encourage businesses, investors and institutions to explore opportunities across borders. But investment does not begin with a brochure. It begins with confidence. An investor wants to know whether meetings can take place on schedule, whether executives can move safely, whether airports remain accessible and whether institutions continue functioning during political disagreement. No investment summit can answer those questions if the street outside tells a different story.

This is where Islamabad becomes more than a local governance issue. For diplomats, repeated lockdowns become part of their impression of Pakistan. For tourists, uncertainty discourages travel. For businesses, unpredictability raises risk. For overseas Pakistanis considering bringing capital home, instability creates hesitation. Democracies across the world experience demonstrations, strikes and public anger. The difference lies in how effectively institutions manage disagreement without repeatedly paralyzing normal life. The right to protest matters, security matters and public order matters, but economic life matters too. A container may block a protest route, but it can also block a worker, a patient, a delivery vehicle, a business meeting and an investor. The solution cannot always be to shut down the city.

This challenge becomes more important when viewed against the wider global environment. Canada, where I am based, is also reassessing its position in a changing international order. For decades, geography made the United States Canada’s dominant economic partner, and that relationship will remain fundamental. Yet geopolitical and trade uncertainty has increased Canada’s interest in diversifying relationships with Europe and other markets. Ottawa is looking more seriously toward the European Union for cooperation in trade, critical minerals, energy, defence, technology and investment. Canada understands that excessive dependence on a single relationship can create vulnerability. That lesson matters for Pakistan too. Countries today are trying to build several relationships at the same time without losing their own priorities.

Europe itself offers useful examples. Iceland recently rejected reopening negotiations to join the European Union, but that should not be misunderstood as rejecting Europe. Iceland already participates closely in European economic and security frameworks, while much of the domestic debate centres on sovereignty, fisheries and how much national decision-making should be transferred to Brussels. Norway presents a similar case. It has rejected full EU membership in past referendums, yet remains deeply connected to European markets through the European Economic Area and other arrangements. International relations are increasingly less about choosing one camp permanently and more about building practical relationships while protecting national interests. Pakistan needs the same maturity. It must maintain strong relations with China, the Gulf, Europe, Canada, the United States and regional partners without turning every relationship into a zero-sum political debate. But international partnerships require domestic credibility. You cannot convincingly tell investors that Pakistan is open for business if the capital repeatedly becomes difficult to enter.

At the same time, the Gulf is showing how quickly geopolitical instability can affect ordinary life thousands of kilometers away. Tensions involving Iran, Israel, the United States, Saudi Arabia, Yemen and the Houthis continue to create uncertainty around energy markets, shipping routes and regional security. For businesses, they mean higher transport costs, delayed shipments, rising insurance expenses and uncertainty in supply chains. For ordinary families, they often mean higher fuel prices. Once fuel rises, the effect spreads almost everywhere. Food transportation becomes more expensive, public transport costs increase, manufacturing expenses rise and businesses pass additional costs to consumers. This is how conflicts taking place far away enter an ordinary household. A family in Islamabad, Toronto, Karachi, London or Lahore may have nothing to do with decisions made in Washington, Tehran, Tel Aviv, Riyadh or Sana’a, yet they still pay part of the economic price.

That is one reason public frustration is growing globally. Over the past two decades, ordinary people have lived through wars, financial crises, a pandemic, inflation and repeated geopolitical confrontations. It is understandable that people begin asking uncomfortable questions. Who benefits from permanent crisis? Who profits from war? Who gains when energy prices rise? Who controls reconstruction after destruction? These are legitimate questions, but there is a line between asking who benefits from a crisis and claiming that every crisis was secretly planned. There is no credible basis for saying that every war, pandemic or economic shock is controlled according to some hidden global timetable. What can be said with greater confidence is that crises create opportunities for powerful actors. Defence companies can profit from conflict, energy producers can benefit from higher prices, financial institutions can benefit from market movements and governments can sometimes use external crises to strengthen domestic narratives. That does not prove that every crisis was deliberately created, but it does justify asking whether the international system protects ordinary people strongly enough when powerful interests collide.

To me, that is the real autopsy of our time. The world seems permanently occupied with managing the next crisis rather than building systems strong enough to absorb one. For Pakistan, however, the immediate responsibility begins at home. Pakistan cannot control every global conflict, determine what happens between Iran and Israel, decide American foreign policy or control international oil prices. But Pakistan can decide how Islamabad functions during domestic political disagreement. It can establish clearly understood protest routes, protect emergency corridors and airport access, ensure commercial transport does not become collateral damage, provide businesses with clear information and make restrictions transparent, proportionate and temporary. Most importantly, political communication must begin before every disagreement reaches confrontation and closure. That is not weakness. It is institutional maturity.

This matters because Pakistan needs foreign investment, tourism, business partnerships and diaspora engagement. The country has significant advantages: a large population, strategic location, natural resources, human capital and an entrepreneurial private sector. But potential alone does not attract serious investment. Predictability does. Investors can work with complicated regulations, difficult markets and higher taxes. What they struggle with most is uncertainty. I often think about what a visiting businessman sees when arriving in Islamabad. He may attend a conference where Pakistan is presented as the next major investment destination and hear about technology, minerals, tourism, agriculture and regional connectivity. Then he leaves the conference hall and discovers that several roads are blocked because another political confrontation has begun. Which message will remain with him, the presentation inside or the road outside?

That is the uncomfortable question Pakistan must answer. Canada’s growing engagement with Europe, Europe’s debates over sovereignty and integration, and the Gulf’s vulnerability to conflict all point toward one common reality: countries are searching for stability in an unstable world. Pakistan should be doing the same. The objective is not to eliminate politics, protest or disagreement. It is to build institutions strong enough to absorb disagreement without repeatedly disrupting ordinary life. Islamabad should become Pakistan’s strongest example of that capacity because this city is not merely the federal capital. It is Pakistan’s diplomatic face, where foreign governments watch the country, potential investors meet policymakers, international organizations assess risk and Pakistan tells the world what it wants to become.

If Islamabad repeatedly disappears behind containers, that message becomes difficult to believe. Pakistan wants investment, tourism, greater international trade and stronger diaspora engagement. It wants overseas Pakistanis to bring capital, ideas and networks home. All of that is possible, but confidence must become part of the country’s infrastructure. Investment is not attracted by slogans. It is attracted by stability. Tourism is not created by advertisements. It is created by confidence. International credibility is not built inside conference halls alone. Sometimes, it is built, or destroyed, on the road outside.

__
About the author: Sadat Choudhary is a Canada-based media, business and cultural diplomacy professional with long-standing engagement in community initiatives, international events and Canada-Pakistan relations. He is the Founder and CEO of Red Media Circle and International Sister Cities Initiative Organization. Sadat is involved in cross-border business and cultural initiatives linking Canada, Pakistan and international markets.